SINO VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT COMPANY LTD |
|
Parameter | Bus model | ZK6729DX |
Engine model | ISF3.8s4R154 | |
Dimension(mm) | 7245*2270*3035 | |
G.V.W.(kg) | 7900 | |
Luggage compartment(M3) | 0-0.2 | |
Max. speed(km/h) | 90 | |
Chassis | Chassis manufacturer | Zhengzhou Yutong Bus Co., Ltd. |
Clutch | Outer diameter of friction lining 362, hydraulic remote control with air assistance | |
Gearbox | 6-speed manual gearbox | |
Brake system | Dual circuit pneumatic brake, energy storage spring parking brake, ABS | |
Suspension system | Leaf spring, bidirectional telescopic shock absorber | |
Tire | 215/75R17.5 | |
Fuel tank (L) | 90 | |
LHD/RHD | LHD | |
Others | - | |
Body | Seats | 35+1+1 |
Interiors | Split-type interior luggage rack, curtain | |
Air conditioner (A/C) | Non-independent roof-mounted A/C (16000kcal/h) | |
Heating system | Non-independent radiator | |
Audio & video system | Back guide monitor | |
Service parts | Electronic clock | |
Other facilities | Stop arm, 3M reflective stripe |
Parameter | Bus model | ZK6669DX |
Engine model | YC4FA130-30 | |
Dimension(mm) | 6645*2270*2955(roof hatch)/3025 (A/C) | |
G.V.W.(kg) | 7700 | |
Luggage compartment(M3) | --- | |
Max. speed(km/h) | 80 | |
Chassis | Chassis manufacturer | Zhengzhou Yutong Bus Co., Ltd. |
Clutch | Outer diameter of friction lining 362, hydraulic remote control with air assistance | |
Gearbox | 5-speed manual gearbox | |
Brake system | Dual circuit pneumatic brake, energy storage spring parking brake | |
Suspension system | Leaf spring, bidirectional telescopic shock absorber | |
Tire | 215/75R17.5 | |
Fuel tank (L) | 70 | |
LHD/RHD | LHD/RHD | |
Others | - | |
Body | Seats | 30 YTXT1 seats + 1 guider seat + 1 driver seat |
Interiors | Softened interiors | |
Air conditioner (A/C) | Optional: non-independent roof-mounted A/C (14000kcal/h) | |
Heating system | Optional | |
Audio & video system | MP3 player | |
Service parts | Back guide monitor, reversing buzzer, school bus marker light | |
Other facilities | Medicine box, compulsive patrol device, 32G SD memory card video
recorder with 4 cameras |
Now the traffic situation, let the children go home on foot, it is
difficult for parents to rest assured. However, parents shuttle
children from school to school, but there are many adverse, one is
the impact of parents, students after school, on-time pick-up will
inevitably need to take up work time. Therefore, comparatively free
parents heart child, every day timing down the work at hand to pick
up; and unable to put down working parents some had to please
parents generation, for frail elderly people. This is a big burden.
The second is the impact of traffic, not only car family occupy the
road parking, even empty hands pick those, such a huge team stand
at the gate of the school, the smooth flow on the roads surrounding
the school also produced no small impact.
How to ensure the safety of students on the way to school, and do
not affect the work of parents and school surrounding traffic
order? I think that the more appropriate approach is to use the
school bus to pick up students. Although busing students not only
to increase the cost of running a school, but also involve the
teacher effort, but weigh the pros and cons, school bus superiority
is incomparable. This practice has been proved from a number of
pilot cities.